Yes, Mr. Taranto, ethics are sooooo pretentious. Give me a break. Is he really surprised that someone who works for the Times is going to suggest that people who live in different households and would pay for two different physical subscriptions pay for different online subscriptions? Would Taranto advocate that people who read the WSJ share their passwords with everyone so people don't have to pay to read his column? (Actually, that sounds like a great idea.) And attacking the NYT for their corrections? How petty can you get? I guess the WSJ never makes mistakes. Oh, wait:
4 comments:
Why doesn't he just come up with his own material?
Yes, Mr. Taranto, ethics are sooooo pretentious. Give me a break.
Is he really surprised that someone who works for the Times is going to suggest that people who live in different households and would pay for two different physical subscriptions pay for different online subscriptions? Would Taranto advocate that people who read the WSJ share their passwords with everyone so people don't have to pay to read his column? (Actually, that sounds like a great idea.)
And attacking the NYT for their corrections? How petty can you get?
I guess the WSJ never makes mistakes. Oh, wait:
http://online.wsj.com/article/Corrections.html
This may be one of the most hypocritical Taranto articles I've ever read. And that's saying something.
I thought you would like it, Julia G
Post a Comment