Potomac Fever is the blog of the Hamilton College Semester in Washington Program.
With an income of 2.6 million in 2010, I'm not surprised Newt is platforming for the 1%.
He endorsed the Contract with America...I'm not surprised he's platforming for the 1% either. That doesn't make his argument on the premise of OWS false.
Although strange that people seem to forget that the OWS movement actually has a higher employment rate than protestors in the Tea Party movement.http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/11/most-occupy-protesters-have-jobs.htmlCharacterizing the movement as lazy seems a little farfetched to me. For the most part these protestors are in fact employed people that protest AFTER work. They are tax-paying citizens and they have the right to use our public spaces as a podium for their political beliefs. As for the bath comment, well, protestors tend to be dirty...maybe Newt has a point there...http://wepartypatriots.com/wp/2011/11/09/get-a-what-a-job-70-of-occupy-wall-streeters-are-employed-compared-to-56-of-tea-partiers/
Not really surprised about the number of employed protestors. Those that there REI tents are expensive.
Post a Comment